Newspaper journalism
But I wished to evaluate how newspaper journalism per se is changing instead of being driven by the normative assessment of whether the change is desirable. In the age of digital media, newspapers are struggling to survive (Meyer, 2009; Morton, 2009). aaj ki taja news
To that end, they are experimenting with a wide variety of content, style, and presentation, especially on the front page (Shaw, 2006; Weldon, 2008). One manifestation of that ongoing experiment common to almost all leading American dailies is the growing number of feature stories and analytical news stories (Johnston & Graham, 2012; Weldon, 2008). all hindi news
Moreover, under this new model, the front-page layout includes fewer articles, all to add value to the medium that cannot live up to the speed requirements of the Internet era. To the extent that I am interested in capturing the decline of instantaneous, event-centered news reporting and the rise of analytical and feature reporting, this study is more analogous to the second but much smaller group of literature represented by Barnhurst and Mutz (1997) and Fink and Schudson (2014). Barnhurst and Mutz found that over a period of a century, newspaper content became progressively less event-centered and more analytical, based on an evaluative scale of 1 to 10. The content analysis found that the mean score of less than 2 earlier in the 20th century had increased to close to 3 by the end of it. Fink and Schudson classified front-page articles of three representative American newspapers into conventional, contextual, investigative, and social empathy. What they referred 3522 Miki Tanikawa International Journal of Communication 11(2017) to as “conventional” is the bread-and-butter news story that informs readers of the important event that the newspaper has just learned, which seems identical to the notion of event-driven news in Barnhurst and Mutz. Their content analysis of three newspapers from 1955 to 2003 showed that the conventional fell from 85% of the front-page content to 47%, and what they described as “contextual” rose from 8% in 1955 to 45% in 2003
Comments
Post a Comment